STUDENTS’ METACOGNITION PROCESS IN SOLVING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN TERMS OF KEIRSEY’S PERSONALITY TYPE

  • Intan Fathimah Ahmadah Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Rooselyna Ekawati Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Keywords: Metacognition, Problem Solving, Keirsey's Personality Type

Abstract

Metacognition plays an important role in problem-solving activities. It will help students to find what the problem is and understand how to get the solution. This study aimed at describing the student's metacognition process based on Keirsey's personality types. This research used qualitative method with descriptive approach and it was conducted involving eight students who have equal mathematical abilities and the same gender. The selected students represented Keirsey’s personality types. They were carried out through two types of tests, namely the Keirsey Temperament Sorter and the Mathematics Ability Test. The result showed that each personality type could through indicators of the metacognition process. However, there are some indicator components missed. Rational and idealist student have not been able to carry out the metacognition process in the regulation stage properly. Guardian and artisan student have been able to carry out the metacognition process well. This study suggests the teacher can facilitate students in each personality type by determining the appropriate learning model, learning activities, and assessments to obtain better results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kemendikbud, Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan tentang Implementasi Kurikulum. Jakarta: Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia, 2013.
[2] NCTM, “Why Is Teaching With Problem Solving Important to Student Learning?,” no. 703, 2010.
[3] A. M. Gallagher et al., “Gender Differences in Advanced Mathematical Problem Solving,” vol. 190, pp. 165–190, 2000, doi: 10.1006/jecp.1999.2532.
[4] L. Carmo, F. Pereira, A. Gomes, and A. Mendes, “Learning styles and problem solving strategies,” in 3rd E-Learning Conference, 2006, no. September, pp. 7–8.
[5] F. Pajares and J. Kranzler, “Self-Efficacy Beliefs and General Mental Ability in Mathematical,” Contemp. Educ. Psycology, vol. 20, pp. 426–443, 1995, doi: 10.1006/ceps.1995.1029.
[6] D. Setyadi, “Proses Metakognisi Mahasiswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika ( Studi Kasus Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika UKSW ),” J. Mat. Kreat. - Inov., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 93–99, 2018, doi: 10.15294/kreano.v9i1.13505.
[7] J. A. Livingston, “Metacognition : An Overview,” 2003.
[8] A. Kuzle, “Patterns of Metacognitive Behavior During Mathematics Problem-Solving in a Dynamic Geometry Environment Ana Kuzle University of Paderborn,” Int. Electron. J. Math. Educ., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 20–40, 2007.
[9] S. Sengul and Y. Katranci, “Meta-cognitive Aspects of Solving Indefinite Integral Problems,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 197, no. February, pp. 622–629, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.205.
[10] R. Dewi, “Keterampilan Metakognitif Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Pada Materi Larutan Penyangga Melalui Model Pembelajaran Pemecahan Masalah,” Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 2014.
[11] L. Nulhakim, “Analisis Keterampilan Metakognitif Siswa yang Dikembangkan Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah pada Materi Kelarutan dan Hasil Kali Kelarutan,” Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, 2013.
[12] M. T. Magiera and J. S. Zawojewski, “Characterizations of social-based and self-based contexts associated with students’awareness, evaluation,and regulation of their thinking during small-group mathematical modeling,” J. Res. Math. Educ., vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 486–520, 2011, doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc.42.5.0486.
[13] T. J. Batteson, R. Tormey, and T. D. Ritchie, “Approaches to learning , metacognition and personality ; an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 116, pp. 2561–2567, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.611.
[14] N. Soleimani, O. Nagahi, M. Nagahisarchoghaei, and R. M. Jaradat, “The Relationship between Personality Types and the Cognitive - Metacognitive Strategies,” vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 29–44, 2018, doi: 10.5296/jse.v8i2.12767.
[15] N. Ibrahimoglu, I. Unaldi, M. Samancioglu, and M. Baglibel, “The Relationship Between Personality Traits And Learning Styles: A Cluster Analysis,” Asian J. Manag. Sci. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 93–108, 2013.
[16] Masriyah and M. H. Firmansyah, “Students’ Mathematical Literacy in Solving PISA Problems Based on Keirsey Personality Theory,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 953, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/953/1/012203.
[17] D. Keirsey, Please Understand Me II: Temperament, Character, Intelligence. California: Prometheus Nemesis Books, 1998.
[18] D. Keirsey and M. Bates, Please Understand Me. California: Prometheus Nemesis Books, 1984.
[19] L. D. Fitriana, Y. Fuad, and A. H. Rosyidi, “Dynamism of Open-Ended Problem Solving: Study on Junior High School Students Behavior Based on Keirsey Personality Type,” in International Conference on Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture and Humanity (STEACH 2018), 2018, vol. 277, pp. 1–5, doi: 10.2991/steach-18.2019.1.
[20] S. Solichah and R. Sulaiman, “the Profile of Junior High School Students About Pisa Problem Solving Based on Personality Type,” MATHEdunesa, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 465–471, 2019.
[21] D. Purnomo, T. Nusantara, and S. Rahardjo, “The Characteristic of the Process of Students ’ Metacognition in Solving Calculus Problems,” Int. Educ. Stud., vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 13–25, 2017, doi: 10.5539/ies.v10n5p13.
[22] M. J. Dewiyani, “Karakteristik Proses Berpikir Siswa dalam Mempelajari Matematika Berbasis Tipe Kepribadian,” in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA, 2009, pp. 481–492.
[23] A. D. Pertiwi, Masrukan, and B. E. Susilo, “Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Melalui Pembelajaran Model 4K Berdasarkan Tipe Kepribadian Peserta Didik Kelas VII,” Kreano J. Mat. Kreat., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 195–204, 2014, doi: 10.15294/kreano.v5i2.4550.
[24] A. Raza, L. F. Capretz, and Z. U. L. Mustafa, “Personality Profiles of Software Engineers and Their Software Quality Preferences,” Int. J. Inf. Syst. Soc. Chang., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 77–86, 2014, doi: 10.4018/ijissc.2014070106.
[25] Kasriana and R. Ode, “Deskripsi Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Trigonometri Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian dan Tingkat Kecemasan Belajar Siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 6 Makassar,” J. Mat. dan Pembelajaran, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 158–171, 2018.
[26] I. Riawan and D. R. Puspananda, “Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika pada materi aritmatika sosial ditinjau dari tipe kepribadian siswa,” vol. 2, no. 20, pp. 13–24, 2020.
Published
2021-02-01
Abstract views: 53 , PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloads: 34