PERBANDINGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN COOPERATIF LEARNING TIPE JIGSAW DENGAN GROUP RESUME DALAM MENINGKATKAN KEAKTIFAN MAHASISWA

  • Khairul Anshari Universitas Muhammadiyah RIau

Abstract

The cooperative learning model requires students to be active and discuss, such as the jigsaw and group resume types which both require students to be active in learning. The purpose of this study was to compare the jigsaw type learning method with the group resume in the student development course, in order to see the level of student activity. This study used a comparative descriptive method. The population was all students who took the student development course. The results showed that the activity value in the group resume reached a maximum of 75% and a minimum of 65%, this is because not all students are active in contributing to learning. In the jigsaw type, the maximum activity value was obtained at 76% and a minimum of 68% because students do have a role to be active in every learning process. The student activities observed were viewing activities, listening activities, speaking activities and writing activities with an increase in the values ​​obtained by students. So it can be concluded that the jigsaw model produces more active students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Kemendikbud. (2013). Permendikbud Nomor 65 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Proses. Jakarta
[2] Spencer, Kagan 1992 Cooperative Learning. San Juan Capistrano, Kagan: Cooperative Learning.
[3] Isjoni, (2009). “Cooperative Learning”.Bandung: Alfabeta
[4] Safari, Y., & Marlina, M. (2024). Systematic literature review: Model kooperatif tipe Jigsaw dalam pembelajaran matematika di sekolah dasar. HEXAGON: Jurnal Ilmu Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.33830/hexagon.v2i2.6857
[5] Khurrosyidah, A. M., Manado, I., Manado, I., & Manado, I. (2024). Model cooperative learning tipe Jigsaw dalam pembelajaran Nahwu: Sebuah tinjauan atas temuan-temuan terbaru (2019–2024) ulasan tentang cooperative learning pada awal abad ke-21 mengelompokkan model ini dengan pembelajaran berbantukan teman sebaya (Bor). Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mashadir: Journal of Arabic Education and Literature, 4(1), 65–80.
[6] Fadhly. (2014). Model pembelajaran kooperatif teknik Jigsaw. Indonesian Journal of History Education, 1(2), 11–24.
[7] Palupi, D. I., Rahmani, E., Yusnita, E., Pertiwi, H., Gustina, H., & Priyanti, N. (2022). Mengenal model kooperatif Numbered Head Together (NHT) untuk pembelajaran anak usia dini. EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v4i1.89
[8] AB Santoso, F Imron (2021) Pengaruh Model Kooperatif Tipe Group Resume Pada Pelajaran Ips Terhadap Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas V SD Kecamatan Laweyan Kota Surakarta. https://ejournal.utp.ac.id/index.php/JMSG/article/view/1316
[9] Mulyasa. 2011. Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah, Konsep Implementasi. Bandung
[10] Sudjana, Nana. 2004. Dasar-dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung :Sinar Baru Algensido Offset.
[11] Eko Widiyanto. (2015) Pengaruh Aktifitas, Kreatifitas dan Motivasi Belajar Siswa terhadap Prestasi Belajar Kompetensi Alat Ukur di SMK Institut Kotoarjo. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Otomotif Universitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo. Purworejo
[12] Arikunto, S. 2014. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktis. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Published
2025-02-05
Abstract views: 23 , PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloads: 22