Efficiency Analysis of the U-Net Architecture with a MobileNetV2 Encoder for Coffee Leaf Rust Segmentation.

Authors

  • Muhammad Adeva UPN "Veteran" Jawa Timur
  • Faisal Muttaqin UPN "Veteran" Jawa TImur
  • Budi Mukhamad Mulyo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37859/coscitech.v7i1.11221
Keywords: Deep Learning, Efisiensi Komputasi, Karat Daun Kopi, MobileNetV2, U-Net

Abstract

Coffee Leaf Rust (Hemileia vastatrix) poses a serious threat to Robusta coffee productivity. Manual identification is often slow and subjective, while standard Deep Learning segmentation methods like U-Net with VGG16 encoder bear heavy computational loads (~24.89 million parameters), hindering deployment on resource-constrained devices. This study aims to optimize computational efficiency by proposing a Lightweight U-Net architecture based on the MobileNetV2 encoder. The model's performance was comparatively evaluated against the VGG16 baseline using the PlantSeg public dataset. Experimental results show that MobileNetV2 integration successfully reduced model size massively by 96% (to ~0.95 million parameters) and accelerated inference time by ~20% (76.28 ms). Although there was a slight F1-Score decrease of 0.3% compared to the baseline, the proposed architecture offers the best trade-off between efficiency and accuracy, making it a viable solution for mobile implementation

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

International Coffee Organization (ICO), “Coffee Report and Outlook, December 2023,” 2023.

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS), “Statistik Kopi Indonesia 2022,” 2023.

J. G. A. Barbedo, “Plant disease identification from individual lesions and spots using deep learning,” Biosyst. Eng., vol. 180, pp. 96–107, 2019.

S. P. Mohanty, D. P. Hughes, and M. Salathé, “Using deep learning for image-based plant disease detection,” Front. Plant Sci., vol. 7, p. 1419, 2016.

A. Picon et al., “Deep convolutional neural networks for mobile capture device-based crop disease classification in the wild,” Comput. Electron. Agric., vol. 161, pp. 280–290, 2019.

S. Minaee, Y. Y. Boykov, F. Porikli, A. J. Plaza, N. Kehtarnavaz, and D. Terzopoulos, “Image segmentation using deep learning: A survey,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 3523–3542, 2021.

O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, “U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015, Springer, 2015, pp. 234–241.

M. Sandler, A. Howard, M. Zhu, A. Zhmoginov, and L.-C. Chen, “MobileNetV2: Inverted residuals and linear bottlenecks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2018, pp. 4510–4520.

T. Laibacher, T. Weyde, and S. Jalali, “M2U-Net: Effective and Efficient Retinal Vessel Segmentation for Real-World Applications,” in CVPR Workshops, 2019.

M. V. L. Branch and A. S. Carvalho, “Polyp Segmentation in Colonoscopy Images using U-Net-MobileNetV2,” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.15715

T. Wei et al., “PlantSeg: A Large-Scale In-the-wild Dataset for Plant Disease Segmentation,” 2024. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.04038

C. Shorten and T. Khoshgoftaar, “A survey on Image Data Augmentation for Deep Learning,” J. Big Data, vol. 6, 2019.

K. Simonyan and A. Zisserman, “Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition,” 2015. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.1556

S. J. Pan and Q. Yang, “A Survey on Transfer Learning,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1345–1359, 2010.

D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization,” 2017. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980

Downloads

Published

2025-04-28

How to Cite

Adeva, M., Muttaqin, F., & Mulyo, B. M. (2025). Efficiency Analysis of the U-Net Architecture with a MobileNetV2 Encoder for Coffee Leaf Rust Segmentation. Jurnal CoSciTech (Computer Science and Information Technology), 7(1), 84–90. https://doi.org/10.37859/coscitech.v7i1.11221