ANALYSIS OF DISMISSAL OF BANKRUPT NOTARY POSITIONS BASED ON NOTARY OFFICE LAW AND BANKRUPTCY LAW

  • Aulia Raihan Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
  • Selamat Widodo Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto
Keywords: Dismissal, Position, Notary, Bankruptcy

Abstract

Many people believe that it cannot be justified to dismiss a Notary dishonorably just for reasons of bankruptcy, as determined by the Court.  If we look closely of Article 12 letter a of the Law on the Position of Notaries, it turns out that the meaning of this article is unclear. It is not clear whether the Notary was bankrupted in his personal capacity as an individual (natuurlijk person) or in his official function as a public official. The issues that will be discussed are the procedures for terminating the position of a bankrupt notary and whether the dismissal of the notary's position is in accordance with the principles of justice. The research methodology used is normative juridical research. The findings of this research indicate that a Notary who is declared bankrupt can be temporarily dismissed from his position as intended in Article 9 paragraph (1) letter a. Furthermore, if the bankruptcy statement has permanent legal force, the Notary can be permanently dismissed from his position by the Minister, on the recommendation of the Supervisory Board of the Central Supervisory Board, as intended in Article 12 letter a of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning the Position of Notaries. The Bankruptcy Law does not explicitly regulate the role of Notaries. However, it can be concluded that persons subject to the regulations outlined in the Bankruptcy Law are limited to legal incompetence and are not permitted to exercise control over their assets. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Buku

Daeng Naja, Teknik Pembuatan Akta, Pustaka Yustisia, Yogyakarta, 2015.

Hyronimus Rhiti, Filsafat Hukum Edisi Lengkap (Dari Klasik ke Postmodernisme), Cetakan kelima, Universitas Atma Jaya, Yogyakarta, 2015.

Johnny Ibrahim, Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Bayumedia, Malang, 2006.

M. Hadi Subhan, Hukum Kepailitan : Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan, Kencana Prenada Media Group, Jakarta, 2008

Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum. Cetakan Pertama, Mataram University Press, Mataram, 2020.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana, Jakarta, 2010.

Hasil Penelitian/Tugas Akhir

Diyantari, N. A, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris Yang Diberhentikan Dari Jabatannya Akibat Pailit, Skripsi, Universitas Darul Ulum Islamic Centre Sudirman Guppi, Semarang, 2023.

Karima, Makna Kepailitan Sebagai Alasan Pemberhentian Jabatan Notaris, Tesis, Universitas Jember, Jember, 2017

Artikel Jurnal

Adheria Juniresta, Budi Santoso, Hanif Nur Widhiyanti, “Impilikasi Yuridis Putusan Pailit Terhadap Profesi Notaris Menurut Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia”, Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, Vol. 12 No. 1, 2021.

Aga Waskitha Wiryawan, “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Notaris Yang Dinyatakan Pailit Ditinjau Berdasarkan Unda ng-Undang Jabatan Notaris”, Lex Renaissance, Vol. 1 No. 5, 2020.

Ali Hadi Shahab, “Akibat Hukum Terhadap Notaris Yang Dinyatakan Pailit”, Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, Vol. 9 No. 3, 2021.

Amanda Maylaksita, “Problematik Interpretasi Pengaturan Kepailitan Terhadap Jabatan Notaris di Indonesia”, Lex Renaissance, Vol. 1 No. 4, 2019.

Amira Inaz Clarissa Pambudi, F. T, “Prinsip Kepastian Hukum Pemberhentian Notaris Akibat Dinyatakan Pailit”, Mimbar Yustitia, Vol. 6 No. 1, 2022.

Dimas Hanif Alfarizi, Etty Susilowati, Siti Mahmudah, “Tanggung Jawab Perseroan Terbatas Terhadap Karyawan Sebagai Kreditor Preferen Dalam Kepailitan”, Diponegoro Law Journal, Vol. 5 No. 2, 2016.

Filianty, Habib Adjie, “Notarist Affairs Reviewed By Law And Notary Department”, Yurisdiksi : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Dan Sains, Vol. 16 No. 4, 2021.

Galuh Puspaningrum, “Notaris Pailit Dalam Peraturan Jabatan Notaris”, DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum, Vol. No. 4 (2), 2019.

Habib Adjie, H, “Legal Limitations for Dismissing (Permanent and Temporary) Notaries from their Positions Due to Bankruptcy”, Italienisch, Vol. 11 No. 2, 2021.

Hamori Delines, Z. D, “Bankruptcy as a Reason for Termination of Notary in Indonesia”, International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, Vol. 7 No. 11, 2020.

I Wayan Topik Widnyana, “Pemberhentian Notaris Dengan Tidak Hormat Atas Dasar Pailit Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19”, Jurnal Kertha Semaya, Vol. 11 No. 11, 2023.

Kerina Maulidya Putri, Ichsan Anwary, Diana Hait, “Kewajiban Notaris melakukan Pembacaan dan Penandatanganan Akta di Depan Semua Pihak secara Bersama-Sama”, Notary Law Journal, Vol. 1 No. 2, 2022.

Malik Wahyu Kurniawan, “Prinsip Kepastian Hukum Jatuh Pailit Terhadap Notaris”, Jurnal Rechtens, Vol. 10 No. 2, 2021.

Nilna Muna Yuliandari, Yu Un Oppusunggu, “Upaya Hukum Notaris Yang Diberhentikan Dengan Tidak Hormat Ditinjau Dari Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara”, Jurnal USM Law Review, Vol. 4 No. 2, 2021.

Qurratu Uyun Ramadani Zulkhainen, “Politik Hukum Ketentuan Putusan Pailit Sebagai Dasar Pemberhentian Tidak Hormat Terhadap Jabatan Notaris”, Officium Notarium, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2021.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris

Published
2024-02-28
Section
Articles
Abstract views: 48 , PDF downloads: 28