ANALISIS PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI FRANCHISEE AKIBAT FRANCHISOR YANG MELAKUKAN PEMUTUSAN PERJANJIAN FRANCHISE SECARA SEPIHAK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37859/jeq.v8i3.5144
Abstract
In the franchisee agreement there is still an imbalance of position between the franchisor and the franchisee. This is because the clauses in the franchisee agreement are made unilaterally by the franchisor without negotiation, while the franchisee can only accept. In addition, there are also problems regarding the unilateral termination of the franchisee agreement by the franchisor which is very detrimental to the franchisee. The purpose of this research is to find out whether the unilateral termination of the agreement by the franchisor is permitted in Government Regulation Number 42 of 2007 concerning Franchising, Minister of Trade Regulation Number 71 of 2019 concerning the Implementation of Franchising and the Civil Code. Then it also aims so that we can find out about legal protection for franchisees who experience these problems. The research method used in this article is a normative legal research method. Meanwhile, the approach used is the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. Based on the results of the research that has been done, it can be concluded that unilateral termination of the agreement by the franchisor is not allowed, then the franchisee who has suffered losses due to this problem can claim compensation from the franchisor.
Downloads
References
Agustina , K. D., & Nurmawati, M. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Rahasia Dagang Dalam Usaha Franchise Di Bidang Makanan Dan Minuman. Jurnal Kertha Semaya 6, No. 2.
Andika, I. N., Mahendrawati, N. M., & Widiati, I. P. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Franchisee Akibat Pemutusan Sepihak Dalam Perjanjian Franchise. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, Vol. 2, No. 3.
Hadi, M. A. (2022). Penilaian Bisnis Waralaba (Valuation of Franchise) Kajian Penilaian Properti Takberwujud Dalam Suatu Konsep Teori Penilaian Bisnis. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Indonesia. (2007). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 42 Tahun 2007 Tentang Waralaba . Jakarta.
Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Menteri Perdagangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 71 Tahun 2019 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Waralaba. Jakarta.
Margono, S. (2010). Aspek Hukum Komersialisasi Aset Intelektual. Bandung: Nuansa Aulia.
Mariana, N. P., & Subaw, M. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pengusaha Dalam Perjanjian Waralaba Ack Fried Chicken. Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum 8. No. 10.
Nugroho, S. A. (2014). Hukum Persaingan Usaha Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana Prenamedia Group.
Pangkerego, O. A., Karamoy, R. V., & Runtunuwu, R. T. (2022). Kajian Terhadap Tanggung Gugat Karena Wanprestasi Dan Perbuatan Melanggar
Hukum Berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Lex Privatum Vol. X No. 1.
Umami, Y. Z., & Kustanto, A. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Unsur Pokok Perjanjian Dan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Dalam Perjanjian Franchise. Jurnal Ilmiah
Ilmu Hukum QISTIE Vol. 13 No. 2.
Wicaksana, H. R., Putra, G. S., Ludianti, E., Ramadhan , M. F., & Rahasdi , D. V. (2022). Praktik Hukum Waralaba di Indonesia. Surakarta: UNISRI Press.
Wijaya, K. M., & Kusuma, A. A. (2021). Pemutusan Perjanjian Franchise Secara Sepihak Yang Mengakibatkan Kerugian Kepada Franchisee Sebelum Berakhirnya Perjanjian. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, Vol. 8, No. 11.
