Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi yang Bersifat Mengatur (Positive Legislature) dalam Upaya Menghadirkan Keadilan Substantif

  • Indra Fatwa UMRI

Abstract

Abstract

This research is a normative study, taking into account and referring to the laws and regulations and decisions of the related Constitutional Court. The problems examined are: First, does the Constitutional Court have the authority to make decisions that are positive legislature? Second, whether the reasons and considerations of the Constitutional Court judges made a positive legislature decision in decision No. 14 / PUU-XI / 2013? The results showed that: a. The Constitutional Court is normatively not authorized to issue positive legislature decisions. However, on the basis of efforts to bring substantive justice to the community, in several decisions the Constitutional Court Judges felt the need to make legal breakthroughs. b. The reasons and considerations of the Constitutional Court Justices in the decision No. 14 / PUU-XI / 2013 to make a regulatory decision is a consideration of insufficient time for legislators to make new rules if the decision is carried out at that time. Given that the General Election stage was already underway.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Daftar Pustaka
Buku-buku:
Abdul Latif, Fungsi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Upaya Mewujudkan Negara Hukum Demokrasi, CV. Kreasi Total Media, Yogyakarta, 2007
Abdul Aziz Hakim, Negara Hukum Dan Demokrasi Di Indonesia, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2011
Jimly Asshiddiqie, Hukum Tata Negara Dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2012
Maruarar Siahaan, Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2012
Martitah, Mahkamah Konstitusi Dari Negative Legislature Ke Positive Legislature, Konstitusi Press, Jakarta, 2013
Moh. Kusnardi Dan Hamaily Ibrahim, Pengantar Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Pusat Studi Hukum Tata Negara Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia Dan CV. Sinar Bakti, Jakarta, 1976
Munafrizal Manan, Penemuan Hukum Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi, CV. Mandar Maju, Bandung, 2012
Niā€™matul Huda, Lembaga Negara Dalam Masa Transisi Demokrasi, UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2007
________ Dinamika Ketatanegaraan Indonesia Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi, FH UII Press, Yogyakarta, 2011
Jurnal:
Moh. Mahfud MD, Rambu Pembatas Dan Perluasan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jurnal Konstitusi, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta, 2009
Puguh Windarawan, Pergeseran Kekuasaan Tipologi Ketiga: Fenomena Kekuasaan ke Arah Constitutional Heavy,Jurnal Konstitusi, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta, 2012
Perundang-undangan:
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi
Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 2008 tentang Pemilihan Umum Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden
Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi

Putusan:
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 14/PUU-XI/2013 tentang Pengujian Pasal 3 ayat (5), Pasal 9, Pasal 12 ayat (1) dan ayat (2), Pasal 14 ayat (2), dan Pasal 112 Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 2008
Published
2021-04-30
Section
Articles
Abstract views: 19 , PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloads: 23