Efisiensi Perusahaan: Apakah Busyness Dewan Komisaris Berkontribusi?
Abstract
The busyness of the board members has become a hot topic since this can positively and negatively impact corporate governance outcomes, such as company efficiency. However, a limited study investigates the role of supervisory board busyness and company efficiency using Indonesian data. Therefore, this study aims to determine the relationship between supervisory board busyness and company efficiency. In addition, this study also analyzes the effect of the supervisory board experience and size on firm efficiency. Forty-two publicly listed transportation companies are employed as research samples. Secondary data from the annual and financial reports are used, and multivariate regression analysis is applied. This study found that supervisory board experience is positively related to company efficiency (α=5%). Hence, the company's efficiency is achieved if the supervisory board has more experience. Besides, this study also found that company profitability, leverage, and size significantly related to company efficiency.
Downloads
References
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. Journal of Finance, 62(1), 217–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01206.x
Adeabah, D., Gyeke-dako, A., & Andoh, C. (2019). Board gender diversity, corporate governance and bank efficiency in Ghana : a two stage data envelope analysis ( DEA ) approach. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(2), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2017-0171
Alberty, P., Zaitul, Z., Puttri, D., & Ilona, D. (2023). Board Diversity and Government Link Company Performance: the Case of Emerning Country. Journal Markcount Finance, 1(3), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.55849/jmf.v1i3.145
Ali, F., Wang, M., Jebran, K., & Ali, S. T. (2021). Board diversity and firm efficiency: evidence from China. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 21(4), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-10-2019-0312
Bonn, I., Yoshikawa, T., & Phan, P. H. (2004). Effects of board structure on firm performance : A Comparison Between Japan and Australia. Asian Business and Management, 3(1), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.abm.9200068
Colpan, A. M., & Yoshikawa, T. (2012). Performance Sensitivity of Executive Pay: The Role of Foreign Investors and Affiliated Directors in Japan. Corporate Governance An International Review, 20(6), 547–561.
Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, D. R. (1999). Entrepreneurial ventures as an avenue to the top?: Assessing the advancement of female CEOs and directors in the Inc. 100. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 4(1), 19–32.
Darmadi, S. (2016). Ownership concentration, family control, and auditor choice: Evidence from an emerging market. Asian Review of Accounting, 24(1), 19–42.
Douma, S., George, R., & Kabir, R. (2006). Foreign and domestic ownership, business groups, and firm performance: Evidence from a large emerging market. Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 637–657. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.535
Durbin, J., & Watson, G. S. (1950). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression. I. Biometrika, 37, 1950.
Eisenberg, T., Sundgren, S., & Wells, M. T. (1998). Larger Board Size and Decreasing Firm Value in Small Firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 48(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(98)00003-8
Fama, E. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. The Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817410.022
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency Problems and Residual Claims. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1086/467038
Fich, E. M., & Shivdasani, A. (2006). Are Busy Boards Effective Monitors? The Journal of Finance, 61(2), 689–724. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00852.x
Foong, S., & Idris, R. (2012). Leverage, product diversity and performance of general insurers in Malaysia. The Journal of Risk Finance, 13(4), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/15265941211254462
Ghahroudi, M. R. (2011). Ownership Advantages and Firm Factors Influencing Performance of Foreign Affiliates in Japan. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(11), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v6n11p119
Ghozali, I. (2014). Ekonometrika: Teori , Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan IBM SPSS 22 (Edisi 7). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Gray, S., & Nowland, J. (2015). The diversity of expertise on corporate boards in Australia. Accounting and Finance, 57(2), 429–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12146
Grubbs, F. F. (1969). Procedures for Detecting Outlying Observations in Samples. Tachometric, 11(1), 1–21.
Gujarati, D. (1995). Basic Econometric. McGraw-Hill.
Hair, J. F., William, C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Editio). Pearson Education Limited.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1984.4277628
Hambrick, Donald C. (2007). Upper Echelons Theory: An Update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
Hamdi, M., Ilona, D., & Zaitul. (2021). Supervisory board and Indonesia’s company internationalisation. Int. J. Business and Globalisation, 28(1/2), 148–160.
Harymawan, I., Nasih, M., Rahayu, N. K., Kamarudin, K. A., & Wan Ismail, W. A. (2022). Busy CEOs and financial reporting quality: evidence from Indonesia. Asian Review of Accounting, 30(3), 314–337. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-11-2021-0203
Harymawan, I., Nasih, M., Ratri, M. C., & Nowland, J. (2019). CEO busyness and firm performance: evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon, 5(5), e01601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01601
Hillman, A. M. Y. I., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of Directors and Firm Performance : Integrating Agency and Resource Dependence Perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383–396. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2003.10196729
Huther, J. (1997). An empirical test of the effect of board size on firm efficiency. Economics Letters, 54(3), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00035-9
Ilona, D., Zaitul, & Ethika. (2019). Supervisory Board and company borrowing: The case of developing economics. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 8. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.63
Jensen, C., & Meckling, H. (1976). . Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jiraporn, P., Singh, M., & Lee, C. I. (2009). Ineffective corporate governance: Director busyness and board committee memberships. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(5), 819–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.09.020
Kavitha, D., Nandagopal, R., & Uma, B. M. (2019). Impact of the busyness and board independence on the discretionary disclosures of Indian fi rms. International Journal of Law and Management, 61(1), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-04-2018-0062
Larmou, S., & Vafeas, N. (2010). The relation between board size and firm performance in firms with a history of poor operating performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 14, 61–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-009-9091-z
Lin, Y., Wang, Y., Chiou, J., & Huang, H. (2014). CEO Characteristics and Internal Control Quality. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12042
Lu, X., Wang, J., & Dong, D. (2013). Busy boards and corporate performance. China Finance Review International, 3(2), 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/20441391311330618
Mak, Y. T., & Kusnadi, Y. (2005). Size really matters: Further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 13(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.09.002
Manning, M. L., & Munro, D. (2004). The business survey researcher’s SPSS cookbook (2nd ed). Pearson Education.
Muth, M. M., & Donaldson, L. (1998). Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: a contingency approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00076
Nas, T. I., & Kalaycioglu, O. (2016). The effects of the board composition, board size and CEO duality on export performance: Evidence from Turkey. Management Research Review, 39(11), 1374–1409. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2015-0216
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford Business Books.
Ratri, M. C., Harymawan, I., & Kamarudin, K. A. (2021). Busyness, tenure, meeting frequency of the ceos, and corporate social responsibility disclosure. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(10), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105567
Sarkar, J., & Sarkar, S. (2009). Multiple board appointments and firm performance in emerging economies: Evidence from India. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 17(2), 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2008.02.002
Sekaran, U. (2013). Reserch Methods For Business.
Shrader, C., Blackburn, V., & Iles, P. (1997). Women in management and firm financial performance : An exploratory study. Journal Managerial Issues, 9(3), 355–372. http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1001&context=management_pubs
Shu, P. G., Yeh, Y. H., Chiu, S. B., & Yang, Y. W. (2015). Board external connectedness and earnings management. Asia Pacific Management Review, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2015.03.003
Spitzeck, H., & Hansen, E. G. (2010). Stakeholder governance: how stakeholders influence corporate decision making. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 10(4), 378–391. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701011069623
Tan, J. D., Supratikno, H., Pramono, R., Purba, J. T., & Bernarto, I. (2019). Nurturing transgenerational entrepreneurship in ethnic Chinese family SMEs: exploring Indonesia. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 13(2), 294–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-04-2018-0132
Tan, K. M., Bany-Ariffin, A. N., Kamarudin, F., & Abdul Rahim, N. (2019). Does directors’ experience positively moderate the impact of board busyness on firm efficiency? Evidence from Asia-Pacific. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 11(3), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-01-2019-0008
Tan, K. M., Kamarudin, F., Bany-Ariffin, A. N., & Abdul Rahim, N. (2020). Moderation of directors’ education on board busyness-firm efficiency. Management Decision, 58(7), 1397–1423. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2017-0905
Tan, K. M., Kamarudin, F., Bany-Ariffin, A. N., & Rahim, N. A. (2018). Firm efficiency and board busyness: Empirical evidence in southeast and Northeast Asia. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 52(2), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.17576/jem-2018-5202-19
Trinh, V. Q., Elnahass, M., Salama, A., & Izzeldin, M. (2020). Board busyness, performance and financial stability: does bank type matter? European Journal of Finance, 26(7–8), 774–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2019.1636842
Trinugroho, I., Risfandy, T., Hanafi, M. M., & Sukmana, R. (2022). Busy commissioners and firm performance: evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Emerging Markets, ahead of p(ahead of print), ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-01-2020-0007
Van Ees, H., Gabrielsson, J., & Huse, M. (2009). Toward a behavioral theory of boards and corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00741.x
White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48(4), 817–838.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2003). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (2nd Editio). Thomson South Western. https://doi.org/10.1017/asb.2017.16
Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–334. https://doi.org/0803973233
Zaitul, & Ilona, D. (2018). Gender in Audit Committee and Financial reporting timeliness: The case of uniquecontinental European model. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(2.29), 436–432.
Zaitul, Melmusi, Z., & Ilona, D. (2019). Corporate governance and bank performance: Global financial crisis 2008. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 8, 625–636. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-7092.2019.08.54
Zaitul, Ridwan, M., & Pratiwi, H. (2018). Dividend policy in Indonesian companies: Does corporate governance matter? International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(3.25), 306–310. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.25.17587.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Akuntansi dan Ekonomika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 48 , 
PDF downloads: 54
