Perilaku Pemerintah Indonesia Dalam Memaksimalkan Welfare (Pendekatan Rawlasian-Utilitarian)
Abstract
The concept of utilitarian welfare in Indonesia is identically applied to the implementation of the government's fiscal capacity policy. The research design is a quantitative concept, namely an experimental design using the weights of measuring income per capital, taxes, subsidies as a function of Iriani-Tamoka welfare with the central government constraint is to maximize the social welfare of the community. The results of the study found that government behavior in setting the tax burden is identical to utilitarian behavior in maximizing the welfare of its people. The government's transfer policy through social assistance and social security which is distributed to the community as an effort by the government to maximize utility through public welfare under the constraints of subsidy allocation and the multiplier effect caused by the determination of government taxes is identical to Rawlsian's behavior.
Downloads
References
Anugrah Ranifial, Taufiq Marwa, Imelda. Analisis Hubungan Antara Pengeluaran Pemerintah dengan Ketimpangan Disribusi Pendapatan di Sumatera Selatan. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Vol. 14 No.1 (2016) 31-40.
Aminah. Implikasi Konsep Utilitarianisme dalam Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Hutan terhadap Masyarakat Adat. MMH Jilid 43 No. 2 (2014) 172-178.
Charles M. Tiebout. A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy ,Vol. 64, No. 5, (Oct., 1956), pp. 416-424
Christophe Muller. Price index dispersion and utilitarian social evaluation. Economics Letters 89 pp 141–146, 2005.
Damanhuri Fattah. Teori Keadilan Menurut John Rawls.. TAPIs Vol.9 No.2 (2013) 31-45.
Ista Aryogi, Dyah Wulansari. Subjective Well-being Individu dalam Rumah Tangga Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Terapan 01 (2016) 1-12.
Iqbal Hasanuddin. Keadilan Sosial: Telaah atas Filsafat Politik John Rawls. Reflesi Volume 17 Nomor 2 (2018) 193-204.
Jaideep Roy, Randy Silvers, Ching-Jen Sun. Majoritarian preference, utilitarian welfare and public information in Cournot oligopoly. Games and Economic Behavior 116 (2019) 269–288.
Leonardo Becchetti Luigino Bruni Stefano Zamagni. (2019). he Microeconomics of Wellbeing and Sustainability 1st Edition, Recasting the Economic Process. Academic Press, Italy.
Lincoln Arsyad. (1999). Ekonomi Mikro. Gemapress, Jakarta.
Martin Lackner, Piotr Skowron. Utilitarian welfare and representation guarantees of approval-based multiwinner rules. Artificial Intelligence 288 (2019) 10-25.
Oded Stark, Marcin Jakubek, Fryderyk Falniowski. Reconciling the Rawlsian and the utilitarian approaches to the maximization of social welfare. Economics Letters 122 (2014) 439–444.
Priyono dan Zainuddin Ismail. 2012. Teori Ekonomi. Dharma Ilmu, Surabaya.
Siti Mardiyah. Efisiensi Alokasi dalam Pandangan Adiwarman A. Karim. Islamic Banking Volume 2 Nomor 1 (2016) 11-21.
Timbul Hamonangan Simanjuntak, Imam Mukhlis.(2012). Dimensi Ekonomi Perpajakan dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi. Raih Asa Sukses, Jakarta.
T Soemarnonugroho. Latar Belakang Konsep Welfare-state dalam Sistem Ekonomi-Politik Amerika Serikat. Jurnal Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik, 12 (1999) 43-53.
Tomoya Tajika. Japanese Government and Utilitarian Behavior. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 36 (2015) 90-107.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Akuntansi dan Ekonomika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract views: 322 , 
PDF downloads: 441
