Analisis Perkembangan Motorik Siswa Kelas 6 di SD Muhammadiyah 4 Pekanbaru
Abstract
Perkembangan motorik memiliki peran penting dalam tumbuh kembang anak dalam mendukung aktivitas fisik, sosial, dan akademik anak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perkembangan motorik siswa kelas 6 di SD Muhammadiyah 4 Pekanbaru. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif dengan teknik observasi, wawancara, serta dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa siswa yang aktif dalam kegiatan fisik, seperti ekstrakurikuler olahraga, memiliki keseimbangan, koordinasi, dan kelincahan yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan siswa yang cenderung kurang aktif dalam kegiatan fisik. Faktor internal seperti motivasi, serta eksternal seperti dukungan lingkungan, fasilitas olahraga, dan kebiasaan di rumah turut memengaruhi perkembangan motorik siswa. Kendala yang dihadapi adalah keterbatasan durasi pendidikan jasmani, minimnya fasilitas olahraga, dan kebijakan sekolah yang membatasi aktivitas fisik. Penelitian ini menyarankan peningkatan durasi pendidikan jasmani, pengadaan fasilitas yang lebih memadai, dan pengembangan program ekstrakurikuler yang mendukung perkembangan motorik siswa secara optimal.
Downloads
References
K. M. Haywood and N. Getchell, Life Span Motor Development, 7th ed. Champaign, IL, USA: Human Kinetics, 2019.
S. W. Logan, L. E. Robinson, A. J. Rudisill, J. C. Wadsworth, and A. R. Morera, “Getting the fundamentals of movement: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children,” Child: Care, Health and Development, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 305–315, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01307.x.
S. W. Logan et al., “Effect of intervention programs to promote fundamental motor skills among typically developing children: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Adolescent Health, 2023.
A. De Meester et al., “Identifying a motor proficiency barrier for meeting physical activity guidelines in children,” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 58–62, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.05.007.
World Health Organization, WHO Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2020, doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.2691.
M. C. M. da Costa et al., “The effects of physical education on motor competence in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Sports, vol. 8, no. 6, Art. no. 88, 2020, doi: 10.3390/sports8060088.
W. Cools, K. De Martelaer, C. Samaey, and C. Andries, “Fundamental movement skill performance of preschool children in relation to family context,” Journal of Sports Sciences, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 649–660, 2011, doi: 10.1080/02640414.2010.551540.
E. K. Webster, C. K. Martin, and A. E. Staiano, “Fundamental motor skills, screen-time, and physical activity in preschoolers,” Journal of Sport and Health Science, vol. 8, pp. 114–121, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2018.11.006.
UNESCO, Quality Physical Education (QPE): Guidelines for Policy-Makers. Paris, France: UNESCO, 2015.
S. Fairclough and G. Stratton, “‘Physical education makes you fit and healthy’: Physical education’s contribution to young people’s physical activity levels,” Health Education Research, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 2005, doi: 10.1093/her/cyg101.
Z. Khodaverdi, W. O’Brien, M. Duncan, and C. C. T. Clark, “Motor competence interventions in children and adolescents—Theoretical and atheoretical approaches: A systematic review,” Journal of Sports Sciences, vol. 40, no. 20, pp. 2233–2266, 2022, doi: 10.1080/02640414.2022.2148897.
M. S. Tremblay et al., “Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for children and youth: An integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep,” Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, vol. 41, no. 6, Suppl. 3, pp. S311–S327, 2016, doi: 10.1139/apnm-2016-0151.
A. T. Jaakkola, N. Wang, J. S. Sääkslahti, and T. Liukkonen, “What factors are associated with children's motor competence?” Journal of Sports Sciences, 2024.
