PROFIL PENALARAN SISWA MTs DALAM MENGAJUKAN MASALAH ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF VISUALISER DAN VERBALISER

  • Reski Wati salam UNESA
Keywords: Reasoning Profile, Problem Posing, Cognitive Style

Abstract

 This research was a descriptive research with qualitative approach that was aimed to describe the reasoning of junior high school  students’ on problem posing viewed from visualizer and verbalizer cognitive style. The subject of this research was consist of two students of the second grade students at MTs Budi Dharma Surabaya with cognitive style verbalizer and visualizer. The instrument used in this research was a cognitive style test, problem posing test, and interview guidelines. Data was analyzed based on the reasoning activity which appears at the time of problem posing.

Based on the results of research showing the differences in reasoning of junior high school  students’ on algebra problem posing viewed from visualizer and verbalizer cognitive style.  When solving problems, verbaliser students know three methods while visualiser students only know two methods of problem solving. In addition, creating new problems, verbaliser students also have more strategies than visualiser students who only discuss problems by rearranging elements of the original problem structure with some change.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Akay, H. The Effect of Problem Posing Oriented Analyses-II Course on the Attitudes toward Mathematical and Mathematics Self-Efficiancy of Elementary Prospective Mathematics Teacher. Australian Journal of Teacher Education Turkey. 1996; Vol. 35
[2] Alwi, H. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Balai Pustaka. 2005
[3] Capraro, M. M, Chavez, R. A., Capraro, M. R. Effective Preparation for Teaching of Algebra at Primary Level. Texas. A & M University. 2008
[4] Carol, W. & Carol, T. PSIKOLOGI. (Edisi 9th). Prentice Hall. Pearson Education. 1999
[5] In Woo, J. H., Lew, H. C., Park, K.S. & Seo, D. Y.(Eds). Proceeding of the 31st conference of the international group for the pdychology of Mathematics Education. Seoul: PME. 2007; Vol. 4 pp.193-200
[6] Joffrion, H. K. Conceptual and Procedural Understanding of Algebra Concepts in The Middle Grades. Texas. A&M University. 2005
[7] Joyce, B. Models of Teaching, Allyn and Bacon. Boston. 1992
[8] Mahmudi. Pembelajaran Problem Posing untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta. 2008
[9] Mason, J. Thingking Mathematically Second Edition. England: Pearson Education Limited. 2010
[10] Mayer, R. E. Three Facets of Visual and Verbal Leaners: Cognitive Ability, Cognitif Style, and Learning Preference. Journal of Education Psychology. 2003; Vol. 95, No.4, 833-846.
[11] McEwan, R.C. & Reynolds, S. Verbalizer and Visualizer: Cognitive Style That Are Less Than Equal. Fanshawe Collage. 2007
[12] Meifiani, N. Analisis Kesulitan Matematika Siswa SMP Negeri Pacitan pada Ujian Nasional Tahun 2009/2010. Prosiding Jurusan Matematika Program Pascasarjana UNY. 2009
[13] Mendelson, A. I. & Thorson, E. How Verbalizer and Visualizer Process the Newspaper Environment. Journal of Communication. 2004
[14] Mendelson, A. L. (2004). For Whom is A Picture Worth A Thousand Words? Effects of The Visualizing Cognitive Style and Attention on Processing of News Photos. Philadelpia. 2004; Journal of Literacy Volume 24.
[15] Miles, B. & Huberman, M. Qualitative data analysis. United States of America: SAGE Publications. 2009
[16] Mulyani, S. Hikayat Profil. Yogyakarta. Lumbung Pustaka UNY. 1983
[17] NCTM. Learning and Teching Geometry, K-12. Rston, Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 2000
[18] NCTM. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. USA. NCTM. 2000
[19] Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Learning for tomorrow: First results from PISA 2003. 2004
[20] Pittalis,M., Christou, C., Mousoulides, N., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. A Structural Model for Problem Posing. Procedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. 2004; vol 4 h.49-56.
[21] Rahmad, R. R. Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa Calon Guru dalam Pengajuan Soal Matematika Tipe Post Solution Posing Berdasarkan Kemampuan Matematikanya. (Disertasi Tidak Dipublikasikan). Universitas Negeri Suabaya. 2013
[22] Rahmad, R. R. Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa Calon Guru dalam Pengajuan Soal Matematika Tipe Post Solution Posing Berdasarkan Kemampuan Matematikanya. (Disertasi Tidak Dipublikasikan). Universitas Negeri Suabaya. 2013
[23] Reid, D. A. Conjectures and refuatations in Grade 5 Mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 2002; Vol 33, No.1, 5-29
[24] Silver, E.A. & Cai, J. (1996). An Analysis of Arithmetic Problem Posing by Middle School Student. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 1996; Vol. 27. No. 5. November 1996, h.521-539.
[25] Silver, E.A., Downs, J. M., Leung, S. S. & Kenny, P. A. Posing Mathematical Problems: An Exploratory Study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. 1996; Vol.27. No.3 ,h. 293-309.
[26] Sirajuddin. Profil Berpikir Statistik Siswa SMP Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Visualiser-Verbaliser. (Disertasi Tidak Dipublikasikan). Universitas Negeri Suabaya. Surabaya. 2015
[27] Siswono, T. Y. E. Proses Berpikir Siswa dalam Pengajuan Soal. Surabaya. Unesa University Press. 2002
[28] Siswono, T. Y. E. Identifikasi Proses Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dalam Pengajuan Masalah (Problem Posing) Matematika Berpadu dengan Model Walls and Creative Problem Solving (CPS). Buletin Pendidikan Matematika VI. 2004; Vol VI No.2
[29] Siswono, T. Y. E. Mengajar dan Meneliti Panduan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas untuk Guru dan Calon Guru. Surabaya. Unesa University Press. 2008
[30] Siswono, T. Y. E. Model Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Pengajuan dan Pemecahan Masalah untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif. Surabaya. Unesa University Press. 2008
[31] Siswono, T.Y.E. Metode Pemberian Tugas Pengajuan Soal (Probelm Posing) dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Pokok Bahasan Perbandingan di MTs Negeri Rungkut Surabaya. Tesis Magister Pendidikan Matematika Surabaya. 1999
[32] Siswono, T.Y.E. (2016).Learning Mathematics through Problem Posing: How is students’ cognitive process in posing a problem?. Universitas Negeri Suabaya. Surabaya. 2016
[33] Skemp, R.R. Psychology of Learning Mathematics. Expanded American Edition. New Jersey. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. 1987
[34] Smith, M. K. Teori Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran. Jogjakarta. Mirza Media Pustaka. 2010
[35] Soekadijo, R. G. Logika Dasar, Tradisional, Simbolik, dan Induktif. Jakarta. PT Gramedia. 1985
[36] Stancey, K. Mathematical Teaching and Learning to Reach Beyond the Basics. Research of Conference. University of Melbourne. 2010
[37] Stiff, L. V., & Curcio, F. R. Developing Mathematical Reasoning in Grades K-12. 1999 Year book. Reston. Virginia. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1999
Published
2020-06-02
Abstract views: 25 , PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloads: 13